Behind-the-scenes is economical & social media friendly

At one institution, I gave a “behind-the-scenes” feel to class representatives by creating a monthly one-page/two-sided newsletter called “Rep Rap.” Using a simple desktop publishing program, I developed this newsletter, photocopied them, and sent them out as self-mailers. The desktop publishing and photocopying was specifically intended to be non-flashy and create an informal feel. I wanted class reps to feel like they were getting something hot-off-the-press so they would know they were in an inner-circle. A glossy, four-color publication wouldn’t have done that.

Think of the “behind-the-scenes” possibilities with social media! As I write this, one recording artist is showcasing his week in the studio in Nashville on his Facebook page. He’s including pictures, videos, and Q&A’s. Or else you could tweet your way through a legislative or city council budget meeting. Or you could take quick “behind the scenes” videos and upload them to YouTube. Then they can be hosted on your webpage, blogs, and all sorts of other sites.

Don’t Get Stuck Here
As fun as engaging is, don’t get stuck in this step either. No prospect has ever made a significant gift just because you were friendly and engaging. People still need to be asked. So once you do your research and engage the prospective donor, it’s time for the moment of truth: asking for money!

Posted in 2-Engage | Tagged | Leave a comment

Give them a “behind-the-scenes” experience

An incredibly helpful engagement tool is getting “behind the scenes.” Here are some ways to engage people in the affairs of your organization that will help you when it comes time to actually ask them for money.

Getting Behind the Scenes

In his book The Anatomy of Buzz, Emmanuel Rosen talks about the buzz created by “behind-the-scenes” experiences. Rosen says we all love to feel like we’re getting a behind-the-scenes look at something. Even if we know it’s not really behind the scenes, we still feel special if it’s an “insider’s” tour.

I fondly remember Walt Disney World’s “Keys to the Kingdom” tour I took in 1998. For approximately five hours, we walked “back stage” and saw all sorts of “secrets” of the kingdom. We knew that we weren’t really seeing all the secrets but it sure felt like we were. The tour certainly exceeded my expectations. And for a person like me, that helped increase my enjoyment of the park on each subsequent visit. More importantly, I keep referring to that tour, even more than a decade later.

This is also true for our donors. This is one of the reasons international development organizations host tours of projects in the developing world. These behind-the-scenes activities help donors buy-in even more to a cause they already like.

You don’t need to be doing international work to give your donors and donor prospects an inside look. Here are a few ways to possibly include your donor prospects in a behind-the-scenes activity:

  • If your library is expanding, you could host a gathering at your construction site and have the general contractor or architect speak. Make sure people are wearing hard hats. There is magic in the power of a hard hat!
  • You might hold a relaxed Q & A with your library director.
  • Consider giving a tour of something you don’t usually showcase—rare treasures in your collection, “dungeons” or restricted stacks, or maybe even a home tour of local authors.

What I love most about the behind-the-scenes aspect of engaging is that it often can be done with little or no expense. Since it’s behind-the-scenes, donor prospects don’t expect it to be as glitzy or as polished as a regular event would be! The unsophisticated nature of the event actually adds to its appeal.

Posted in 2-Engage | Tagged | Leave a comment

Getting to know you

As you get out from behind your desk, where do you begin? It’s helpful to remember why you got involved in your library. What excites you most about your cause? These may be the exact aspects that connect with the other person.

When you’re interacting with people, start by exploring the interests of the other person. I bet someone trying to watch me during my donor visits would get annoyed by how little time I seem to devote to asking the prospective donor for a gift. Instead, I love asking questions like:

  • So what do you do when you’re not eating lunch at this restaurant [or whatever activity you’re both doing at the time]?
  • How long have you been doing that?
  • Really? How did you get started?

Bob Burg’s book Endless Referrals is filled with great questions like this. Fortunately, I love hearing people’s stories. And I find people generally like telling their stories if they see you’re genuinely interested. Usually people are too busy or distracted to care. When you give someone permission to tell their story, you are giving them a tremendous gift.

Another way to get to know the other person is to look around their room or office. What awards and pictures are adorning the walls? What service clubs do they appear to be involved in?

Personally, I love books so I always look at bookshelves. Once I was in a home in California that had two small elegant wooden and bronze plaques on the bookshelves. It turns out they were two patents for freeze-dried coffee! This got me excited! Beyond thinking about the potential royalties or licensing income, I started thinking about all the challenges involved in earning a patent. This must have been something he committed years of his life to. Those thoughts triggered questions that resulted in a fascinating conversation. (It turns out there were no royalties. Since he created this as an employee, the company owned all rights to the invention. Both of us commiserated about that!)

Posted in 2-Engage | Tagged | Leave a comment

Talk about your successes

Engaging is a two way street, so feel free to talk about your successes. A few years ago, I met with a prospective funder to see if their priorities may match with one of our events. Rather than rattling through a prepared sales pitch about the event, I spent a good portion of the time practically bragging about some innovative things our hospital was doing. (We were one of the first hospitals in the entire U.S. to voluntarily disclose its clinical outcomes on the web. We did it right on our website so healthcare consumers can make an informed decision about whether or not they should get cared for by us. That took guts!)

Letting them know how advanced our quality was, also prepared the groundwork for their knowing their gift would be given to a wining cause.

The engage step is possibly even more important than researching. No one raises large amounts of money from behind a desk. As fundraising guru Si Seymour used to say, “You can’t milk a cow with a letter.”

Fundraising is all about relationships. So get out there and meet your prospects!

Posted in 2-Engage | Tagged | Leave a comment

Be genuinely interested in other people

Engaging involves being genuinely interested in people, not just in their checkbook. (Or your perception of their checkbook—some folks look well off but are simply “broke at a higher level.”)

  • Take them out to lunch.
  • Ask them about their story.
  • Visit them when you’re traveling in their area.
  • Send them articles you think might interest them.

Take note of what interests them, and what doesn’t. Do them the courtesy of trying to find something in your cause that relates to their interests. There’s no point in asking someone to make a substantial gift to a cause they don’t care about!

As it is in dating, “engaging” within fundraising is a two-way process. I often let people know my interests outside of work. You would be amazed at how comments like this open people up. I think they start to see me as a real person, not just someone trying to reach into their wallet.

Study after study shows that people give to winning causes, not to needs! If at all possible, don’t talk incessantly about your needs. I often think we in the nonprofit world look like Bill Murray’s character in the movie “What About Bob?” whining to his psychiatrist, “I want. I want. I want. I need. I need. I need!” Donors aren’t motivated by that. Let them know the cool things your organization is doing. This helps them see that their gift will be well used. Show them how their gift can have the play a real part in your library’s mission.

Posted in 2-Engage | Tagged | Leave a comment

Engaging is like dating

I’m amazed by how many nonprofit folks seem to think they can just jump into asking people for money. They go from not asking at all to thinking people will just give when told to.

What if asking for a gift were like getting married. We want to get married but we’re scared to death of meeting people. So we stall as long as we can, staying inside, not going on a single date. Then our parents start getting weird, talking about wanting grandchildren. The pressure keeps building. We being to believe we really need to get married! So we run out of our house, down to the nearest bar, plop down on a stool, and ask the first person we see if they’ll marry us! Crazy, isn’t it?

What’s even crazier is that we get upset when they slap us and say “No!”

But we do that with fundraising. We need funds but we avoid asking people for money. Oh, we might hint at it or talk in general terms, but never a direct ask. At some point, our library gets into a financial crisis and we can’t avoid asking people for money. So we panic and send lots of letters to as big a list of unqualified people as possible—more “suspects” than true prospects. Maybe we photocopy a sheet and insert it with the Chamber newsletter. Then we get all ticked off when nobody gives.

In both dating and fundraising, we need to get to know people before we ask them to make a commitment. We need to engage them in the process.

Posted in 2-Engage | Tagged | Leave a comment

Two warnings

Many of my clients get very uncomfortable with the information discovered in this step. It is pretty amazing how much information is public and available. Remember, you’re not the FBI. You’re simply trying to help your library be an excellent steward of its limited resources. This kind of research helps significantly leverage the effectiveness of your fundraising.

Whatever you do, do not compromise your integrity. I promise you that all these forms of research are legitimate, ethical, and professional. But your integrity is worth more than any amount of funding you may raise for your library. Listen to your conscience and only go as far as you’re comfortable. If you’re getting uncomfortable with what you’re finding, stop. Ask yourself what’s making you uncomfortable.

Remember, usually the largest barriers to our fundraising are our own attitudes to wealth and money. Before you give up on researching, make sure you’re not putting artificial limits on your ability.

Research helps you feel more secure about your ask before you get in front of the donor. Research ends up helping the donor as much as it helps you. If you found out they’ve written editorials against your library, you won’t waste their time asking them to support it!

The second warning is: don’t get stuck on this step. This is just the beginning. The biggest potential danger in research is “paralysis by analysis.” You can do homework until the cows come home, but nobody makes a gift until they’re asked.

I don’t know how many boards I’ve sat on when the inevitable question arises: “Have you researched that? I know we’re hemorrhaging financially, losing money hand-over-fist, but before we fix that by actually asking people for a gift can we take a step back and do more research?” Research can be an easy way to chicken out of asking without looking like a coward. That kind of thinking will kill any fundraising effort. Sometimes, you just need to go for it and make the ask.

Now that we’ve established some of the advantages of research and some simple ways to do it, let’s move on to our next part of getting R.E.A.L.: engage.

Posted in 1-Research | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Peer reviews and the CPI Index

One of the most effective and least expensive ways of researching prospective donors is asking other people. This is often known as a “peer review.” People on the development committee or solicitation task force go over a list of names one by one. They talk about things like the prospect’s interests, their likelihood to give to this project, and how much they should be asked for. This can work in groups as well as in one-on-one meetings.

I love these sessions because they can be highly informative and incredibly helpful in gathering anecdotal information as well as hard data. They also help you discover the links and relationships between prospective donors and other people in the community.

Admittedly not everyone is comfortable talking so frankly about their peers. So I developed the CPI Index. The CPI Index is a form of research that attempts to “objectify” the information. Rather than talking with each other, participants score prospective donors on three criteria:

  • capacity to give,
  • philanthropic nature, and
  • interest in your library or the project.

Capacity: Does the person have money they can give your library? If not, he or she won’t be good fundraising prospects—no matter how nice the person may be. Face it, at some point, your nonprofit needs cash to pay the bills and accomplish its mission.

Philanthropic Nature: Is the person a giver? If he or she doesn’t give gifts to other charities, chances are high the person won’t give gifts to yours.

Interest: Is the person interested in your cause? Bill Gates would have high scores in capacity and philanthropy, but without an interest in your cause, he’s not going to make a gift to your organization. Sorry if this comes as a shock.

To conduct a CPI Index session, prepare a list of names like before but add the three CPI columns. Then ask people to score the prospective donors in each area on a scale of 1 (being lowest) to 5 (being highest) in each of the categories. When they’re done, add up the scores. You’ll want to personally visit people with scores of 12 or higher and invite them to make a gift. Ask the group of peers who would be the best “door openers” to help you get in front of those people.

Don’t toss out the other names! Be sure to also look at the people that scored high C’s and P’s but only mediocre I’s. You can’t change a person’s capacity—no matter how much you shop at their store. And you can’t change their philanthropic nature—they either are generous or they are not. But you can do things to get them more interested in your organization. I’d recommend beginning to cultivate these people for a future gift. You’ll probably find that many of them really aren’t interested in your organization or even in your cause. But you will find a few that will become incredibly committed to your organization if they’re cultivated well. Cultivating well is the focus of our next chapter.

Posted in 1-Research | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Outsourcing donor research

Another way to research is to send all your database information to a vendor that specializes in prospect research and modeling. Groups like Blackbaud’s Target Analytics do this all the time. They have access to large amounts of public information, and they have formulas for knowing how to quantify that information. That information can be like gold to your organization, even on a project as simple as a mailing.

By using this type of service, I cut my annual fund mailings from an entire database of 14,000 records to just mailing the 4,000 most likely to make a gift. I saved a bundle in production and postage!

Posted in 1-Research | Tagged , | Leave a comment

More free online prospect research tools

Now that you have those names, those suspects, how do you find if they are really prospects, if they are capable of making that level of gift to your library?

One of the best tools for this kind of homework is probably one you’re already using: Google. Type the name of the person you want to approach in the Google search box and see what comes up. It’s pretty amazing how much public information is out there on people.

It may be helpful to put their name in quotes and spell out the state you live in to narrow the search. But you’re a librarian so you probably know more about Boolean searches than I do!

What’s really fun is pulling up information that is out of the ordinary. You may find a book review that a person wrote or a club that they’re a part of. While those things shouldn’t necessarily be mentioned during your visit, you will have a much clearer picture of the person when you meet with them.

Be careful not to rely on Google alone! A few years ago, if you typed in my name, half the sites that come up for “Marc Pitman” are for a guy who’s starred in horror movies with names like “Roadkill” and “Deadbeat at Dawn.” It’s a riot, but it’s not me! (I wonder if anyone thinks it is me…) So please be sure to take your Google findings with a grain of salt.

For a treasure trove of similar online research tools, check out the University of Vermont’s Research Tools Page http://www.uvm.edu/~prospect/index.html

With all the web-based tools, don’t forget the good, old fashioned donor files. If your organization has a history of philanthropy, it’s helpful to look at those records on a somewhat regular basis. At some places I’ve worked, they had file cabinets stuffed with records going back to the 1930s! You will find some fascinating information there!

Posted in 1-Research | Tagged , , | Leave a comment